Thread Lift vs Facetite
In the ever-evolving world of cosmetic procedures, two treatments have gained significant attention for their ability to address signs of facial aging: thread lifts and FaceTite. Both procedures aim to tighten and lift sagging skin, but they employ different techniques and technologies. This article will explore the similarities, differences, and potential complications of thread lifts vs FaceTite, helping you make an informed decision about which treatment might be right for you.
Results after FaceTite and a series of Morpheu8 for skin tightening.
Understanding Thread Lifts
Thread lifts are minimally invasive procedures that use specially designed threads to lift and tighten sagging skin. These threads, typically made of polydioxanone (PDO), polylactic acid (PLA), or polycaprolactone (PCL), are inserted beneath the skin using fine needles. Once in place, the threads are gently pulled to lift the skin, creating a more youthful appearance.
The procedure is often referred to as a “lunchtime facelift” due to its quick recovery time and minimal downtime. Thread lifts can target various areas of the face, including the cheeks, jowls, and neck.
Anecdotally, our patients tell us that once the threads resorb, the results typically go away. Because of this, while this treatment may be good for a specific event, it may not be ideal for someone wanting more long-lasting results.
Understanding FaceTite
FaceTite, on the other hand, is a non-surgical radiofrequency-assisted lipolysis (RFAL) procedure. It uses controlled radiofrequency energy to heat and tighten the skin from both above and below its surface. A thin cannula is inserted beneath the skin, while an external electrode moves along the skin’s surface. This dual approach allows for precise heating of the deep and superficial layers of the skin, resulting in fat reduction and skin tightening.
FaceTite is often used to address concerns in the lower face and neck areas, such as jowls, double chin, and loose neck skin. Since there is no physical material left under the skin, it takes longer to see your final results (typically around 6 months). Results last longer than thread lifts; however, especially if maintenance treatments for done with other less-invasive treatments like Morpheus8 or Exilis Ultra.
Thread Lift vs FaceTite: Key Differences
- Technique: Thread lifts use physical threads to mechanically lift the skin, while FaceTite employs radiofrequency energy to tighten skin and reduce fat.
- Invasiveness: Both procedures are minimally invasive, but thread lifts involve inserting threads under the skin, while FaceTite uses a small cannula and external electrode.
- Anesthesia: Both thread lifts and FaceTite can be done under local anesthesia in the office.
- Treatment areas: Thread lifts can be used on various facial areas, including the mid-face and brows. FaceTite is primarily used for the lower face and neck.
- Results: Thread lifts provide immediate lifting results, while FaceTite results develop over time as collagen production increases.
- Longevity: Thread lift results typically last about 1 year, while FaceTite results can last several years with proper skincare and maintenance.
Potential Complications of Thread Lifts
While thread lifts are generally considered safe, it’s important to be aware of potential complications:
- Thread migration: The inserted threads may shift or become visible under the skin.
- Infection: As with any procedure that breaks the skin, there’s a risk of infection.
- Asymmetry: Uneven lifting can result in facial asymmetry.
- Dimpling or puckering: The skin may appear dimpled or puckered where the threads are inserted.
- Thread breakage: In rare cases, the threads may break, potentially requiring removal.
- Nerve damage: Although uncommon, there’s a risk of temporary or permanent nerve damage.
- Extrusion: The threads may work their way out of the skin, requiring removal.
Complications Associated with FaceTite
FaceTite also carries some risks, including:
- Burns: Improper use of radiofrequency energy can cause skin burns.
- Nerve injury: There’s a small risk of temporary or permanent nerve damage.
- Infection: As with thread lifts, there’s a risk of infection at the insertion sites.
- Uneven results: Inconsistent application of energy can lead to asymmetrical outcomes.
- Prolonged swelling: Some patients may experience swelling that lasts longer than expected.
Scar Tissue Formation and Future Facelift
An important factor to consider when choosing between thread lifts vs FaceTite is the potential for scar tissue formation. Both procedures involve manipulating the tissues beneath the skin, which can lead to the development of scar tissue.
Thread lifts, by their nature of inserting foreign material (threads) into the skin, can stimulate a healing response that results in scar tissue formation around the threads. This scar tissue can make future facial surgeries more challenging.
FaceTite, while less invasive than traditional facelifts, still causes controlled damage to the skin and underlying tissues to stimulate collagen production. This process can also lead to some degree of scar tissue formation.
If you’re considering a facelift in the near future (within a year), it’s generally advisable to avoid both thread lifts and FaceTite. The presence of scar tissue from these procedures can complicate a facelift surgery, potentially leading to suboptimal results or increased risk of complications.
Plastic surgeons typically recommend waiting at least a year after thread lifts or FaceTite before undergoing a facelift. This waiting period allows any scar tissue to soften and the effects of the previous treatments to stabilize.
Choosing Between Thread Lift vs FaceTite
Ultimately, the best choice between thread lift vs FaceTite depends on your individual needs, goals, and circumstances. Consult with a board-certified facial plastic surgeon, like Dr. Sarah Saxon, who can assess your unique situation and recommend the most appropriate treatment option.
Remember, while both thread lifts and FaceTite offer less invasive alternatives to traditional facelifts, they are not suitable replacements for individuals with significant skin laxity or those seeking dramatic, long-lasting results. In such cases, a surgical facelift may be the most effective option.
